Model & Assumptions Experimental
- Model
- Per-frame Gaussian steps under a choice of motion model — free Brownian, directed (drift + diffusion), confined in a reflecting corral, or hopping between the compartments of an underlying meshwork. Emitters are rendered with a Gaussian PSF (sigma = 0.21 lambda / NA), each contributing a photon-conserving spot, then Poisson shot noise and Gaussian read noise. A deliberately naive localizer (threshold, local maxima, weighted centroid) recovers the tracks, and their mean-square displacement gives back both the diffusion coefficient and the anomalous exponent α.
- Assumptions
-
- Overdamped 2D motion, isotropic D
- No interparticle interaction or hydrodynamics
- Thin sample; all emitters in the focal plane
- Periodic boundaries: a particle leaving one edge re-enters at the opposite one (a confined particle never reaches them)
- Corral and meshwork walls are hard and reflect specularly; the meshwork is a regular square grid with a single hop probability, not a disordered network
- Validity
- Dilute fields; per-frame step below the PSF width; photon budget above ~100 per frame. Checked live against your inputs below.
- Limitations
-
- No axial motion or defocus (a later module)
- No photobleaching or blinking (a later module)
- The motion models are the ones expressible through DeepTrack2’s own sequential-property mechanism. DeepTrack2 ships no diffusion models itself — it provides Feature.to_sequential(position=rule) and demonstrates free Brownian motion — so each model here is a per-frame update rule and is exported as one.
- Continuous-time trapping and fractional Brownian motion are not included: both need the whole trajectory history rather than one step at a time
- Gaussian PSF approximation, not pupil-based — no aberrations. Its FWHM is 3.9% narrower than an ideal Airy pattern at every NA, and 7–12% narrower than DeepTrack2’s numerically sampled pupil PSF; see the validation note below.
- No motion-blur correction in the MSD fit (Berglund’s −4/3 D dt term is not applied)
- References
-
- B. Midtvedt, S. Helgadottir, A. Argun, J. Pineda, D. Midtvedt & G. Volpe, Quantitative digital microscopy with deep learning, Appl. Phys. Rev. 8, 011310 (2021), doi:10.1063/5.0034891 — the paper DeepTrack2 asks to be cited by.
- DeepTrack2 (DeepTrackAI), MIT licence, https://github.com/DeepTrackAI/DeepTrack2 — the reference implementation this module was validated against and exports scripts for. No DeepTrack2 code is vendored here; the forward model is reimplemented in TypeScript.
- R. E. Thompson, D. R. Larson & W. W. Webb, Precise nanometer localization analysis for individual fluorescent probes, Biophys. J. 82, 2775 (2002), doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75618-X
- B. Zhang, J. Zerubia & J.-C. Olivo-Marin, Gaussian approximations of fluorescence microscope point-spread function models, Appl. Opt. 46, 1819 (2007), doi:10.1364/AO.46.001819
- Notes
- Ground truth is exact — it is an input, not a fit. The dashed green markers are where the particles really are; the localizer never sees them. Boundaries are periodic, which is visible in the trajectory trails.
References
- [1]B. Midtvedt, S. Helgadottir, A. Argun, J. Pineda, D. Midtvedt & G. Volpe, Quantitative digital microscopy with deep learning, Appl. Phys. Rev. 8, 011310 (2021), doi:10.1063/5.0034891 — the paper DeepTrack2 asks to be cited by.
- [2]DeepTrack2 (DeepTrackAI), MIT licence, https://github.com/DeepTrackAI/DeepTrack2 — the reference implementation this module was validated against and exports scripts for. No DeepTrack2 code is vendored here; the forward model is reimplemented in TypeScript.
- [3]R. E. Thompson, D. R. Larson & W. W. Webb, Precise nanometer localization analysis for individual fluorescent probes, Biophys. J. 82, 2775 (2002), doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75618-X
- [4]B. Zhang, J. Zerubia & J.-C. Olivo-Marin, Gaussian approximations of fluorescence microscope point-spread function models, Appl. Opt. 46, 1819 (2007), doi:10.1364/AO.46.001819